President Obama Support Marriage Equality
President Obama, who has long said his views on same-sex marriage were “evolving,” today affirmed his support for marriage equality. In an interview with ABC’s Robin Roberts, the President said “I’ve just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same sex couples should be able to get married.”
Obama’s support comes after a week in which Vice President Biden said he was “absolutely comfortable” with marriage equality and in which North Carolina voters approved a ban on same-sex marriage in their state’s constitution.
The President’s evolution on the issue has taken several years, from “undecided” to “supports civil unions” to, now, full equality.
Mitt Romney refused to comment directly on the President’s statement, but Romney did say this to the Denver Fox affiliate before the President’s statement:
“Well when these issues were raised in my state of Massachusetts, I indicated my view, which is I do not favor marriage between people of the same gender, and I do not favor civil unions if they are identical to marriage other than by name. My view is the domestic partnership benefits, hospital visitation rights, and the like are appropriate but that the others are not.”
In other words, Romney doesn’t just oppose marriage equality, he also opposed civil unions and just about anything beyond “hospital visitation rights.”
Other reactions:
From New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg: “No American president has ever supported a major expansion of civil rights that has not ultimately been adopted by the American people – and I have no doubt that this will be no exception.”
HRC’s incoming president, Chad Griffin: “President Obama’s words today will be celebrated by generations to come. For the millions of young gay and lesbian Americans across this nation, President Obama’s words provide genuine hope that they will be the first generation to grow up with the freedom to fully pursue the American dream. Marriage-the promise of love, companionship, and family-is basic to the pursuit of that dream. Our Constitution’s promise, the promise of liberty, is one that every generation must realize. As President Obama recognized today, the fight to secure marriage equality is the defining element of our generation’s search for greater freedom.”
Anti-marriage zealot Gary Bauer: ”President Obama’s endorsement of same-sex marriage surprised no one. The charade is finally up. We’ve always known that Barack Obama supports same-sex marriage. With every action he’s taken, from court appointments to his rhetoric, he’s been preparing the way to undermine traditional marriage. Obama’s finally made that support explicit…It’s a political move meant to energize his leftwing base and distract Americans from his disastrous economic policies.”
More of the President’s words:
I’ve stood on the side of broader equality for the LGBT community. I hestitated on gay marriage in part because I thought civil unions would be sufficient. I was sensitive to the fact that for a lot of people, the word ‘marriage’ evokes very powerful traditions, religious beliefs.
I have to tell you that over the course of several years as I have talked to friends and family and neighbors when I think about members of my own staff who are in incredibly committed monogamous relationships, same-sex relationships, who are raising kids together, when I think about those soldiers or airmen or marines or sailors who are out there fighting on my behalf and yet feel constrained, even now that Don’t Ask Don’t Tell is gone, because they are not able to commit themselves in a marriage, at a certain point I’ve just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same sex couples should be able to get married.
It’s interesting, some of this is also generational. You know when I go to college campuses, sometimes I talk to college Republicans who think that I have terrible policies on the economy, on foreign policy, but are very clear that when it comes to same sex equality or, you know, sexual orientation that they believe in equality. They are much more comfortable with it. You know, Malia and Sasha, they have friends whose parents are same-sex couples. There have been times where Michelle and I have been sitting around the dinner table and we’re talking about their friends and their parents and Malia and Sasha, it wouldn’t dawn on them that somehow their friends’ parents would be treated differently. It doesn’t make sense to them and frankly, that’s the kind of thing that prompts a change in perspective.
This is something that, you know, we’ve [the President and Mrs. Obama] talked about over the years and she, you know, she feels the same way, she feels the same way that I do. And that is that, in the end the values that I care most deeply about and she cares most deeply about is how we treat other people and, you know, I, you know, we are both practicing Christians and obviously this position may be considered to put us at odds with the views of others but, you know, when we think about our faith, the thing at root that we think about is, not only Christ sacrificing himself on our behalf, but it’s also the Golden Rule, you know, treat others the way you would want to be treated. And I think that’s what we try to impart to our kids and that’s what motivates me as president and I figure the most consistent I can be in being true to those precepts, the better I’ll be as a as a dad and a husband and hopefully the better I’ll be as president.
SFPD: It Gets Better
The San Francisco Police Department has made this wonderful It Gets Better video. It’s absolutely worth watching. It made me tear up a bit, and extremely proud to be a San Franciscan.
Here’s the statement that accompanies the video:
Howard Stern Stands Up for Ellen, Rosie and LGBT People Everywhere
Howard Stern passionately defends Ellen, puts the haters who want J.C. Penney to dump Ellen in their place, and talks about how anti-gay rhetoric hurts gay kids. He calls Obama on his almost-but-not-quite stand on marriage equality and talks about just how bigoted the Republican candidates for president are. Please listen to this — it’s worth it. Go Howard!
[Photo via Dan Nation.]
Celebrities React to Prop 8 Ruling, Part 2
We already ran a post with celebrities reacting to Prop 8 being ruled unconstitutional, but there’s so much positive reaction that we’ve got more to bring you.
Prop 8, sashay away.logo.to/wpZBQA
— RuPaul’s Drag Race (@RuPaulsDragRace) February 7, 2012
Happiness RT @msnbc_breaking: Appeals court: California’s voter-approved ban on same-sex marriages is unconstitutional on.msnbc.com/4dpW6f
— Cheyenne Jackson (@cheyennejackson) February 7, 2012
No #prop8!!!!Yay for equality!:)
![]()
Happy Dance!
— Ricki Lake (@RickiLake) February 7, 2012
Today the US Court of Appeals rules that Prop 8 is unconstitutional. One step closer to equality for every American.
— Chaz Bono (@ChazBono) February 7, 2012
Proposition H8 ruled unconstitutional in California!! This is a big step towards same-sex marriages in CA! noh8campaign.com/article/breaki…
— MileyCyrus.bz (@MileyCyrusBz) February 7, 2012
Fantastic news about Prop 8 being declared unconstitutional! Here’s to freedom and equality for all Americans. #LoveOverHate #Equality
— Meghan McCain (@McCainBlogette) February 7, 2012
Today we took another step towards equality. #Prop8 was found unconstitutional again. I couldn’t be happier.
— Ellen DeGeneres (@TheEllenShow) February 7, 2012
Are my ears hearing this corectly? If so my eyes are filling with tears of joy! thank you lord #Prop8IsUnconstitutional!
— Kelly Osbourne (@MissKellyO) February 7, 2012
Prop 8 has been ruled unconstitutional! In other news, the Pacific Ocean was discovered to be wet.
— Cory Monteith (@CoryMonteith) February 7, 2012
Amazing news about prop 8 being declared unconstitutional!!
— Kristin Cavallari (@KristinCav) February 7, 2012
All QClick Prop 8 coverage. | Even more coverage from QClick Radar.
White House Comes Out Against Virginia Anti-Gay Adoption Bill
The Virginia state legislature is considering legislation that “would allow private adoption agencies to discriminate in placements conflicting with their religious or moral beliefs, including on the basis of sexual orientation. The Virginia House voted last week 71-28 to pass the bill and the Senate is likely to vote on it in the coming days. Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) is expected to sign the bill should it reach his desk.” The Washington Blade asked President Obama, through his press secretary, to comment on the pending legislation.
The President’s spokesperson said:
“While the president does not weigh in on every single action taken by legislative bodies in our country, he has long believed that we must ensure adoption rights for all couples and individuals based on their interest in offering a loving home, not based on discriminatory and irrelevant factors,” said Shin Inouye, a White House spokesperson. “He recognizes that adoptive families come in many forms, and that we must do all we can to break down barriers to ensure that all qualified caregivers have the ability to serve as adoptive families.”
The US Congress is considering a law that would trump Virginia’s. The “Every Child Deserves a Family Act would [allow] the U.S government to restrict federal funds from going to states that have laws or practices allowing for discrimination in adoption on the basis of LGBT status.” Asked if the President supported the federal legislation, his spokesperson said: “While we have not reviewed Congressman Stark’s legislation, we share its goals to expand adoption rights and move the dialogue forward on this issue.”
BREAKING: Federal Appeals Court Overturns Prop 8
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned Proposition 8 on a 2 -1 vote. In other words, they agreed with the trial court that Prop 8 was unconstitutional.
Prop8 ruled unconstitutional AGAIN. Pledge your support to @AFER so all can be #free2marry: bit.ly/pledge8 & RT if you agree.
— AmericanEqualRights (@AFER) February 7, 2012
Key points from the decision, via the AP:
“Although the Constitution permits communities to enact most laws they believe to be desirable, it requires that there be at least a legitimate reason for the passage of a law that treats different classes of people differently. There was no such reason that Proposition 8 could have been enacted,” the ruling states.
The panel also said there was no evidence that former Chief U.S. Judge Vaughn Walker was biased and should have disclosed before he issued his decision that he was gay and in a long-term relationship with another man.
Even if the panel upholds the lower court ruling, it could be a while before same-sex couples can resume marrying in the state. Proposition 8′s backers plan to appeal to a bigger 9th Circuit panel and then the U.S. Supreme Court if they lose in the intermediate court, which would likely put its ruling on hold while that process plays out.
Updates:
From the AP, via New York Times
From the Guardian
All QClick Prop 8 coverage. | Even more coverage from QClick Radar.
9th Circuit to Rule on Prop 8 Tomorrow
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals will issue it’s long awaited decision on Proposition 8 tomorrow. They’ll either agree with the trial court and overturn Prop 8 or disagree with the trial court and keep Prop 8 in place. Regardless of the ruling, every thinks the issue is headed to the US Supreme Court, which will have the final say.
Towleroad has an excellent overview of how we got here and what’s at stake. Metroweekly also has an great Q&A about the issues. Some quick notes from the Q&A:
What happened in the appeal thus far?
The appeals court first heard oral arguments on the appeal on Dec. 6, 2010, at which time the issues of the proponents’ standing to bring the appeal and the underlying constitutionality of the initiative amending California’s constitution to prohibit same-sex couples from marrying were considered by the three-judge panel hearing the appeal.
The three judges are Judge Stephen Reinhardt, a Carter appointee known for being one of the most unabashedly liberal of judges in the appellate courts; Judge Michael Daly Hawkins, President Clinton’s first nominee to the Ninth Circuit; and Judge N. Randy Smith, a conservative Bush appointee who attended Brigham Young University for both undergraduate and law school education and previously served as the head of the Idaho Republican Party.
What will happen on Tuesday and beyond?
On Tuesday, the Ninth Circuit is expected to rule on the questions of Walker’s recusal and the proponents’ standing. The court, if it holds that recusal was not necessary and that the proponents do have standing, will address the constitutionality of Proposition 8.
As the Ninth Circuit previously had issued a stay of the trial court’s judgment pending appeal, there is no reason to think that the court’s opinion — should it affirm the unconstitutionality of Proposition 8 — will take effect immediately. The judges almost certainly will issue a stay of their decision to allow the proponents to decide whether they will appeal such a decision.
At that point, any party dissatisfied with the ruling could seek en banc review, which would require all the active Ninth Circuit judges to vote whether en banc consideration will be given. If a majority supports en banc consideration, then the chief judge of the circuit, Judge Alex Kozinski, and 10 randomly selected appellate judges from the circuit will hear the en banc appeal.
Then further review by the full Ninth Circuit — referred to as “super en banc” consideration — or a request to the Supreme Court to hear the case could follow.
All QClick Prop 8 coverage. | Even more coverage from QClick Radar.
Goldman Sach’s CEO Comes Out For Marriage Equality
The Human Rights Campaign honored Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein at a dinner where it was announced that he’s the newest spokesperson for marriage equality. Reported CNBC:
With its Americans for Marriage Equality campaign, the group has reached out to unexpected spokespeople to advocate for marriage equality. In his spot, Blankfein says that equality is “just good business and is the right thing to do,” and counts himself among the “majority of Americans” who support same-sex marriage.
Why did HRC pick him? The New York Times says:
“If you are a Goldman employee and you are gay or contemplating coming out, this is great,” [Paul A. Argenti, a professor of corporate communication at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth] said. But for Goldman and Mr. Blankfein, the issue of same-sex marriage has nothing to do with what Goldman Sachs does. “If Mr. Blankfein was taking a radical stand on pay you could say wow, that’s big. But equality is simply not an issue you associate with Goldman.”
Still, the campaign is sure to turn heads on Wall Street, which despite having made progress on equality issues over the last decade, is still considered to be a male-dominated, testosterone-driven place.
Not everybody was happy about HRC honoring Goldman Sachs, though. Andrew Beaver on the Huffington Post took HRC to task for honoring Golman Sachs:
HRC’s willingness to whitewash the pasts of individuals and organizations in return for cold cash is nothing new. In some ways I don’t fault the group’s willingness to look these execs in the eye, take their money, and use it to promote LGBT equality. But this strategy has its limits. In honoring Goldman Sachs, HRC is incredibly tone-deaf to the enormous outrage nearly all Americans feel toward the banks and securities firms at the center of the economic meltdown.
The Queer Occupy Wall Street group held a protest to remind people that Goldman Sachs is responsible for some economic practices that helped tank the country’s economy. (Not to mention channeling huge amounts of their huge profits into bonuses for their top employees.)
[Photo via Wikipedia.]
See more about Goldman Sach’s CEO Coming Out for Marriage Equality on QClick Radar.
British Deny Alan Turing Pardon for “Gross Indecency”
You may not have heard of Alan Turing, but you should know who he is. He’s a gay icon, computer science great, and war hero. He was instrumental in winning World War 2 and invented the Turing Machine. These days, Turing Machines are called computers.
Alan Turing was born in 1912 in London, England. In 1936, he wrote a paper describing a Turing Machine, which laid out the conceptual template for a fully functional modern computer (on which I’m writing this and you’re reading this). During World War 2, Turing worked at Bletchley park, the Allied code-breaking HQ. While there, he was instrumental in breaking the German Engima code, and in doing so, allowed the allied to eavesdrop on German communications. And win the war.
Turing was gay and proudly so. And for that he was punished severely.
MTV to Air It Gets Better Special With Dan Savage
MTV and their corporate cousin Logo will air an “It Gets Better” special on February 21st, in collaboration with Dan Savage. MTV announced that Adam Levine, Zachary Quinto, Jake Shears and others would also join the special:
“What you see in the special are all these young people who are at different stages of the coming out process, making it better for themselves using their own power to change and transform their lives,” Savage recently told MTV News.
Savage and his husband, Terry Miller, founded the It Gets Better Project in the fall of 2010 in response to the increasing number of suicides among teenagers who were being bullied by their peers, often because they were LGBT or suspected to be. In keeping with the mission of the project, the special will feature video messages of support from Maroon 5′s Adam Levine, Zachary Quinto, Margaret Cho, Chaz Bono, “Jersey Shore” star Vinny Guadagnino and Scissor Sisters frontman Jake Shears.


